The peer review process is a cornerstone of modern scholarship. Before new work is published in an academic journal, experts scrutinize the evidence, research and arguments to make sure they stack up.
A new global study from IOP Publishing (IOPP) has found that certain peer review communities continue to feel overburdened by reviewer requests, while others remain underrepresented. The survey, which ...
Digital Science CEO Dr Daniel Hook presenting Laura Feetham-Walker with her award at the 19th Academic Publishing in Europe (APE) conference. Laura Feetham-Walker, Reviewer Engagement Manager at ...
Reviewer 1: “This manuscript is a timely and important contribution to the field, with clear methodology and compelling results. I recommend publication with only minor revisions.” Reviewer 2: “This ...
Opinion pieces from C&EN staff addressing core issues in chemistry. For 300 years or so after the creation of the scientific journals, those journals would unsystematically decide what to publish on ...
We must train reviewers to understand and value how the core tenets of health research can address structural and institutional racism. In the past two years, funders and publications have released a ...
A new global study from IOP Publishing (IOPP) has found that certain peer review communities continue to feel overburdened by reviewer requests, while others remain underrepresented. The survey, which ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results